"Miracles from Heaven" is a disruptive new God film from the folks who brought us "Heaven Is For Real." (My review: http://hellburns.blogspot.ca/2014/05/the-movie-heaven-is-for-real-based-on.html#.VvbmEvkrKM8 ) There are many similarities to the two films. Each film is about a miracle experienced by a child. Each child has an out-of-body encounter with heaven and God, and comes from an already-believing family. Each film features scenes in church with preaching and praise and worship music. And each film is, thankfully, well-lit. "Heaven Is For Real," for me, was a much more straightforward film about a four-year-old boy who dies, goes to heaven and comes back, while "Miracles from Heaven" is a much stranger, more complex story of a slightly older girl (ten years old) with a complicated medical condition who experiences a bizarre accident that cures her, or does it? Was it really the accident that cures her? Was it prayer? Was it God intervening no matter what? And how can anyone relate to such a weird miracle?
IS THE TRAILER A BIG SPOILER?
My suspicion was that I had already seen the film just by watching the trailer--that is, all the good parts were shown in the trailer and "spoiled." I was half right. What you see in the trailer is pretty much the third act. A lot is given away in the trailer, to be sure, but I don't know how else the filmmakers could have gotten people in theaters without revealing an event so curious that moviegoers would want to see the full story. Casting big-name actor, Jennifer Garner (as Christy, the Mom), gives even more credibility to this incredulous tale.
I am calling this a disruptive film because my very first gut-reaction was: "'Heaven Is For Real' is about an experience of heaven. 'Miracles From Heaven' is about a family who received a miracle. People's reaction is going to be: I prayed for a miracle for my child and didn't get one!" But this does not seem to be people's reaction. The film does not sidestep this question of the problem of evil, the question of "Why, God?!" and the answers are not the usual. The answers are embedded in events, experiences and the realities the everyday miraculous along with the extraordinary miraculous. There is a wonderful emphasis on "being the miracle" ourselves, but not to the exclusion or doubting of the truly God-miraculous. It's not God or us, it's God and us. And our God is disruptive, is He not?
The film starts off super-saccharine: a portrait of the happiest family in Texas (no doubt to show the contrast to their upcoming struggles). Their church is the happiest place on earth with the best music in Christendom (the golden-voiced Mac Powell from "Third Day" is the music ministry). The pastor is jovial, entertaining , kind and beloved. Life is a dream until middle daughter, Anna (Kylie Rogers) begins having severe, persistent stomach pain out of the blue. The always-excellent New Zealand actor, Martin Henderson, plays Kevin, the husband/Dad: a laid-back veterinarian who doesn't worry too much about anything because of his tremendous faith in God. Christy, instead, is losing faith fast. Although they're a great parental team, "Miracles" is also a story about a fierce mother-warrior who storms heaven, earth and hell to get her daughter help. Jennifer Garner's performance is average, nothing more. Her range is more suited to "Alias," and roles that require a kind of earnest, superficial lightness. The child actors--as are all child actors today it seems--are magnificent.
"Miracles" is not a Hallmark film, not "heartwarming" (both of which I am allergic to). This film "goes there," albeit in a slightly whitewashed way. We observe a little girl who is dying, who is depressed, who is angry, who is going through the five stages of dying. We see a mother at her wit's end and a family who is literally torn apart and focusing all its attention on only one member.
The real Beam family is shown at the end with an update and voiceover from Anna herself. Fascinating.
"Miracles From Heaven" gets better and better as it goes along, and there are even a few surprises at the end. The answers given (to the question of tragedy) midway through the film pale in comparison with the final answers. The answers are not a bunch of tenuous chatter. The answers are lived and inarguable. The ultimate question of the film seems to be: "Is life better with God?" It's a question that each one of us will have to answer for ourselves.
--I would add: "Is death better with God?"
"If we have believed in Christ for this life only we are the most pitiful of men." 1 Corinthians 15:19
--If you think (from the trailer) that the little girl falls OUT of a tree? She doesn't.
--FEMALE DIRECTOR! FEMALE DIRECTOR!
--The soundtrack is rather facile, excepted, and standard for an "inspirational film."
--Without investigating every nook and cranny of the problem of evil, it covers enough.
--Ma always berates me because I don't like her Hallmark films. "What's wrong with a happy ending, huh?!" "Why do you have to be so cynical all the time?!" "There's not enough goodness in life!"
--The film is something of a medical drama (which we are so used to from TV: we now find in-depth medical explanations and terminology interesting).
--Maybe this whole film is a metaphor for the hope of heaven (that thought really came to me at the end, from the film itself). Heaven which is real. Heaven where all shall be well, all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
--Anyone who has lost a child or has a sick child would really appreciate this film, I would think.
--Like "Heaven Is For Real," they do "show" us "heaven." Noooooooooooo!!!!! It doesn't make me wanna go there! But, thankfully, unlike "Heaven Is For Real," they don't try to show us God/Jesus.
--I did cry a bit at the end, OK?
--The aftermath of the "accident" unfolds rather deliciously.
--I was very conflicted about even bothering to see this film for the reasons mentioned above:
1. Didn't I already see the film by watching the trailer?
2. Why would anyone make a film about such an unrelatable episode in someone's life?
3. If you're going to make a film like this, you'd better darn well deal with the problem of evil, and deal with it very, very well.
But they did it. The film is successful as a film and as a God story.
--The ending is really quite good I must say (notwithstanding a hammy speech by Christy and the reaction of the stereotypical, self-righteous, annoying church ladies).
This sounds a lot better than I thought it would be, but I have a question. I live in a town with a famous children's hospital, and every few years some mother (it always seems to be the mother) is arrested for making her child deathly but mysteriously sick because of "Munchausen by Proxy" -- a rare psychological disorder in which a person seeks attention by making another person sick so she can "help" her and also be seen as incredibly admirable and perfect because of her devotion. The woman is always caught because the illness is weird and unexplainable, gets better in teh hospital but worse at home... until they film the child's hospital room and find her doing something like putting feces in the child's IV (the last one was caught doing that). In the commercial I have heard about five milllion times, the mother is said to have devoted her life to finding a cure for her daughter's mysterious illness. I immediately wondered if this story could be a case of M. by Proxy, in which the "miracle" suddenly takes the place of the illness by getting the mother lots of attention and admiration. Now, I know that sounds incredibly cynical, but then so is is nearly killing your child so you get attention, and that HAPPENS. So... did it seem at all like that could be the case? Did they address that in any way? This doubting Thomas needs proof, I guess...ReplyDelete
I know this condition of which you speak. It's kind of brought up in the film by nonbelievers at the end! However, the motility probz the little girl had? It wasn't a mystery and no Mom could ever "do" that to her child. Also there's all kinds of documentation on the child's all-to-well known illness (with no cure) by the best doctors/hospitals in Boston. The bizarre way she was cured is also well-documented. Doubt no longer, but believe! :)ReplyDelete
What's my motivation to see this movie after the trailer itself...any modern-day movie for that matter. (I already know the ending)ReplyDelete
Trailers these days are incredibly unimaginative.
Side Note: Anyone who wants to see Superman vs. Batman (and escaped temptation of seeing all trailers) Know that Zack Snyder is set on destroying the purpose of Superman and it is awful. I was excited after reading the plot that Batman was upset that Superman destroyed buildings and KILLED (Superman would have never done that) and was going to have a good talking to with him. It wasn't any of that. More buildings destroyed, more people killed.
Superman is dead. God is not.
I totally thought the same thing. I REALLY didn't want to see this film. But you really don't know the conclusion. You only know a bit of it. AND you will walk away with some new answers to the perennial "problem of evil." :) Agreed about trailers today. Thanks for the tip about B v. S. The whole premise just sounded wrong to me. AND I cannot abide Affleck where Bale should be. :)Delete
Thank you for your review. Based on it we went to see the movie last night. Like you, we felt it did a good job of tackling the"tough" questions of death, suffering and evil and their challenges to faith. Unlike you, we kind of liked the portrayal of heaven as a Monet painting (the scene in the pond). It's kind of like telling us that really beautiful art (in all its forms) is a glimpse of heaven. All in all, a well cast movie that was satisfying movie on many levels. Thanks again.ReplyDelete